« October 2009 | Main | December 2009 »
Posted by Mike Reed on 27 November 2009 at 03:54 PM | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
I need to know that, don't I? Before I decide whether to take the money?
So I've emailed them:
"Well, I really don't know about this, Yuki. I'm blowing hot and cold, I really am. So I've consulted my readership and there are some pretty strong views about this: some think it might just be a bit of harmless fun and that I shouldn't worry myself about pocketing a bit of money in the process; whilst others think it would be akin to Robert Johnson walking down to the crossroad.
So, not to put too fine a point on it, you have to entice me further with a firm financial offer.
Over to you...
Regards,
David"
Do you think that Yuki will stump up enough cash to tempt me? Or will she merely brush me aside as being a bothersome so-and-so?
Who would ever have thought that beer could be so interesting, eh?
Posted by davidthedesigner on 26 November 2009 at 04:02 PM in stuff | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
...to that question is David Carson.
It's sort of obvious once you know, isn't it?
Posted by davidthedesigner on 26 November 2009 at 03:46 PM in graphic design stuff, stuff | Permalink | Comments (1) | TrackBack (0)
Well, that's nice to hear about Mike's (and Mrs Mike's) Paris jaunt, isn't it? And I'm really looking forward to part two. Ou la partie deux, I suppose I ought to say.
So let's stick with all that French stuff for a bit, because yesterday I popped along to Tate Britain (as one does) to take a peek at 'Peinture Sur Le Motif Pour Le Nouvel Age Post-Photographique'. Not a title that you're familiar with, I would imagine. But if I tell you that the English title is 'Bigger Trees Near Warter', then you might then work out that I'm talking about the biggest painting that David Hockney has ever produced, and which he has donated to the Tate. And boy, it certainly is big.
This is my hasty snap of it, which doesn't do it justice at all - but it does give you some idea of the scale. What this picture doesn't show, though, nor any other that I've seen, is that actually the painting covers three walls of the gallery. That was something that disconcerted me when I first walked in: because I hadn't expected to see three of the things. And at first I couldn't quite work out what was going on. Because my brain was telling me that here were three separate paintings, with the assumption that they must somehow be different to each other. But a closer examination revealed that the two on the flanking walls were colour photographic copies. But it took me a little while to work it out. That's a clever trick that Hockney's pulled off there. Because it makes one consider (or at least it made me consider) the differences between the painting itself and the photographic copies. Because, make no mistake about it, those copies are as faithful as one can get. But the more you look, the more you realise there's a subtlety and a 'soul' to what's on canvas which pixels alone simply can't capture. And if you want to know what I'm talking about, go along and have a very careful look at the area of pink branches to the left of that woman in my snap above. Consider just how many different pinks you can see in that cluster of branches - then compare to the photographic copies, and you'll see exactly what I mean.
And while you're about it, go up really close and take a good look at the third canvas up on the far left and in the top right-hand corner you might spot a stray pubic hair trapped in the oil paint which defines one of the single branches. Whether or not it's David Hockney's though, I couldn't tell you.
Posted by davidthedesigner on 26 November 2009 at 11:11 AM in admired, stuff, this made me smile | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Un peu d'un bargain
The names on the trains
With our two boys safely in the hands of their Granny (God bless Grannies), we wanted to make the most of our two days in France, so we got up ridiculously early and made the 6.40 train to London. By 9am we were in our 'Leisure Select' seats on the Eurostar.
I know I should have been relaxing, but that name, 'Leisure Select', got my copywriter brain going. It's actually First Class, although they don't call it that any more because they've made their Business Premier class the top level.
Posted by Mike Reed on 25 November 2009 at 03:48 PM | Permalink | Comments (3) | TrackBack (0)
Posted by davidthedesigner on 25 November 2009 at 09:08 AM in stuff | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
I expect you're wondering what's going on around here these days? Nothing but questions, isn't it? And posts without pictures - that's not how it's meant to be, now is it?
But I've just been asked if I'd like to be paid to post a video feature which advertises beer. Yes, you read that right: beer. And not even designer beer. But the sort of beer that scallywags in Liverpool down by the four-pack. Before they hot wire the beemer. (By the way, if you're from Liverpool, I'm just pulling your leg. There's no offence intended.)
Of course, they haven't told me exactly how much money. But you can bet your bottom dollar that it'll be considerably less than they'd pay to get the same video onto TV. And there's a condition: 75% of you have to be over the age of 18. So how am I supposed to know how old you are?
What shall I do? Shall I take the money and run? Or should I tell them where to stick it?
And if I do take the money, do I draw the line at alcohol? Or shall I go for for broke and hustle around for a tobacco deal, and maybe a little porn on the side?
Your wish is my command, as it were.
Posted by davidthedesigner on 24 November 2009 at 03:17 PM in stuff | Permalink | Comments (17) | TrackBack (0)
"well, let us begin. first of all, u suck. u suck because every time i look at your work i feel like I've thought of the same things u design but u beat me to it. i know its easier said than done. well i would like to actually say thank you. first of all because you inspired me to be a designer and also because you still inspire me to stick to it. I'm 22 years old, and its hard being an armature graphic designer since there are so many prodigies in this field who seem to get younger and younger. then you come out with of the blue... start out at 25 or 26 (cant really remember) and still be able to create such kick ass work with such passion and start a rucks in the design world. u r the cliche of breaking the rules and making it work and that is just cool man."
Anyone like to guess who this is about?
Posted by davidthedesigner on 20 November 2009 at 12:50 PM in graphic design stuff, stuff | Permalink | Comments (6) | TrackBack (0)
Yes, that's where I've been (not that one, though - a different one, although still with the missing apostrophe). And I'm not supposed to talk about it. Though it's difficult to know what I can't talk about, when the proceedings are held in public (that is the public can attend, although they don't). But the press sometimes attends, I've discovered. But they have to have a reason. Like being able to file a report containing the words 'home to the families of the Duchess of York, Sarah Ferguson and socialite Tara Palmer-Tomkinson' no matter how tenuous the link to the actual case. Nothing sells newspapers quite like upper-class crumpet, obviously.
Actually, I do know what I can't talk about; and that's the process by which we (as in we the jury) reached our decisions. And there were four decisions: four deaths over two days. Three hangings in prison and one man struck by a train. And, yes, it's grim. And thought-provoking. And profoundly sad. And 'there but for the grace of God go I'. But if you ever get asked to sit on a jury (actually you'll be issued with a 'summons') do go and do it. Even if it's only out of public duty.
Meanwhile I have to get my brain back into the land of the living.
Posted by davidthedesigner on 18 November 2009 at 05:59 PM in stuff, use of images | Permalink | Comments (1) | TrackBack (0)
Bienvenue a my little stint on David's blog. In fact, it's not even a stint, really. It's just after I emerged as the lucky winner from David's splendid hat, he asked if I'd report back from my Eurostar jaunt with a post or two. It seems a small price to pay.
(There must be more to Paris than this. From Panoramio)
I also thought you lot probably know all manner of hidden Parisian gems that my wife Wendy and I could explore during our two days there. So I thought I'd ask for suggestions, and then report on them. Or at least one or two of them.
In fact, inspired by Ben, I've even grabbed the TypePad iPhone app, so may even blog from the locations themselves. Try to contain your excitement.
All I have at the moment is the Eurostar tickets. We're going to do the last-minute hotel thing (again, recommendations gratefully received), but the schedule for our two days is pretty much clear. We both want to go back to the Musée D'Orsay, because, well, why wouldn't you? But what else should we know about that's a bit more off the beaten track? Galleries, restaurants, shops, historic monuments, whatever. I don't know Paris all that well, and would love to hear your ideas.
All thoughts welcome in the comments, and thanks in advance for helping me enjoy my prize.
Posted by Mike Reed on 13 November 2009 at 03:32 PM | Permalink | Comments (6) | TrackBack (0)
Recent Comments